The learning hub

The questions buyers research first. Answered first.

Most B2B sites bury the answers behind a "schedule a call" button. We'd rather you learn what you need to learn here, decide whether we're a fit, then book. Or not.

Watch · trust

How your marketing builds trust before the first call.

Matt on why the modern buyer decides who they want to work with before they ever reach out, and what a website has to do to earn that decision. It's the thinking behind everything below: the answered questions, the disqualifier, and the pricing math.

Read the transcript

It comes down to trust. This is the single most important thing. If you don't trust someone, you're not going to buy from them, whether it's a product, a service, or whatever it might be. In some situations you may have no choice but to buy from someone you don't trust, but that's the exception to the rule.

The buyer now is much different than 25, 30, 40 years ago. There used to be a guy named Tom Hopkins, a great sales trainer, and he'd teach different sales techniques. One was the puppy dog close: you let them take it home, play with it, try it out, and they like it so much they just buy it. Another was the Benjamin Franklin close. You'd sit with your prospect, take out a piece of paper, draw a line across the top, and write "pro" and "con." You'd say, "This is how Benjamin Franklin would make a decision," and list out the pros and the cons.

I remember somewhere around 1998 or '99, I had done that very thing. As I pulled out the piece of paper and started to write, the customer said, "Oh, I know this. This is the Benjamin Franklin close." At that point I knew I had to change what I was doing. The market is always changing, and marketers have a hard task, because they have to stay ahead of the curve if they're going to try things like the Benjamin Franklin close.

But when we start to focus on trust, and on how trust is built, and we look at the modern-day buyer, what we find is that they typically already know 85% to 90% of what they need to know about you before they ever speak to you. In surveys, 85% of people, once they have their shortlist together, the three or four companies they've researched and decided they want to talk to, already have a preference for who they want to do business with, even though they haven't spoken to anyone yet.

So this means your website, the material you share across it, and the way you handle your marketing is where they're deriving their feelings from. That's what we focus on. We create trust inside the information they're going to find when they research you.

We make it very clear and transparent on the website what the pricing is. We help define the big eight, the eight questions that come up on every sales call, the ones everyone asks. We put those on the website so people can read the questions and the answers before they meet with you. That way the call becomes more efficient. We also put disqualifiers. We look and say, "Okay, who isn't your customer?" and we put that on the website, because it shows people we're not just trying to sell to anybody. We've recognized our ICP, and this is who we're best for.

Pricing is a big one. When I tell people they should put their pricing on their website, they get very nervous. A lot of websites have some call to action, like "get a quote or an estimate," but you get there and you have to hand over an email address or a phone number, and you still don't get the information you wanted. I don't know about you, but I never hit that button. The feeling of having someone call me or email me, solicited, is just as uncomfortable for me.

Maybe you can't put the specific price on your website, but you can show the math on how it comes about, so they can at least get a good idea of what it's going to cost. This does a couple of things. One, it contributes to the sense of transparency, which contributes to the feeling of trust. But it also qualifies the person when they reach out. If that information is available and they've done the research, they understand your price range. Now you know they're within range, and they've qualified themselves before they even call. You don't have to run the budget qualification during the sales call.

Those are a few examples of the things we do that make a difference. But the overarching idea is that we want to build trust into the relationship before they call. The website, the social media, the places where you make information available about your company, that's what they're absorbing before they get on the phone with you. We want to make sure that material is geared in a way that increases trust before they get on the call. And then we do training and other things to continue that trust all the way through the contract.

Problems & objections

The eight things you're already worried about.

If you've read the manifesto and felt the resistance, the resistance has a name. Here it is, with our actual answers, not the answers a marketer would give.

What if my salespeople refuse to be on camera?

The honest answer: most do at first. We've never had a rep refuse after week 4, but week 1 always has one or two who are openly hostile. The on-camera coaching in weeks 2 and 3 is built around that resistance, not around it.

If your reps have a hard contractual or cultural block on going on camera (regulated industry, identity-protected roles, anonymous sales motions), this is the one thing that breaks the engagement. Better to know now.

What if my product is too complex / too regulated for 30-second video?

The 30-second format is one piece of the library; it's the top of the funnel. The "80% video" is 7 to 12 minutes. The customer-journey walkthrough is 3 minutes. The pricing video is 90 seconds. Complexity gets a longer container, not a no.

Regulated industries (healthcare, fintech, legal) add 2 to 3 weeks to the schedule for compliance review. That's it. The format still works.

Won't this just produce the same cringe sales-bro content I scroll past?

Sales-bro content is the failure mode of "be on camera" without "have a POV." The asset library starts from the manifesto and the disqualifier. What makes a rep on camera worth watching is that the rep has something specific to say.

If after 4 weeks of work the videos still read as generic, that's a signal we haven't found the POV yet, and the milestone-based payment structure protects you from paying for that.

We tried inbound and it didn't work. Why is this different?

"Inbound" usually means: the marketing team writes blog posts the sales team has never read. Sales-Led Marketing inverts that. The asset library is built from the seven questions the rep already answers on every first call, so the content sounds like the rep, because the rep made it.

The math also changes. Inbound asks "did the page rank?" Sales-led asks "did the rep have a shorter first call?" Different question. Different measurement.

Doesn't seller-on-camera burn out the rep within six months?

The publishing rhythm is built so that one rep produces one new asset every two weeks, not every day. That's sustainable. The asset library compounds (content from month 3 is still working in month 18), so the marginal effort goes down, not up.

The reps who burn out are the ones doing 5 LinkedIn posts a day. We're not asking for that.

What happens to our existing marketing team during this transition?

Best case: they own the publishing rhythm we hand off. The work shifts from "produce content" to "operate the asset library plus add new SKUs as the company grows." That's a clean evolution of the role.

Harder case: if the existing team's identity is paid-media plus brand, they'll feel sidelined. Worth having that conversation early. We've seen it work both ways.

How long until we see pipeline from this work?

First leading indicators (lower CPQM, shorter first call, higher meeting acceptance) usually show by week 8. Pipeline impact lags those by another 60 to 90 days depending on your sales cycle.

If your sales cycle is 9 months and you need pipeline this quarter, this isn't the right tool. An SDR firm might be. See the comparisons page.

What if my buyers genuinely don't use TikTok / Reels / YouTube?

"Sales-led video" doesn't mean TikTok. Most of the asset library lives on the website, on LinkedIn, and inside the rep's outbound sequences. The platform is wherever the buyer already is.

If your buyer is "procurement at a Fortune 500 healthcare system, only reachable via RFP", yeah, the platform mix is different. The diagnostic call sorts that out before we both commit.

The Selling 7

The seven on-camera videos every B2B site should have, and where ours stand.

Sheridan's Selling 7 is the set of videos buyers actually watch before they ever take a meeting. We ship all seven in every engagement. Below: what each one does, why it works, and the current state of ours.

01 · Cost & price video Recording May 2026 →

Founder walks the pricing math in 90 seconds. Not the number; the math: what drives it up, what drives it down, what we'd refuse at any price. Lives on /pricing. The single highest-impact video on the site (Sheridan reports a transparent pricing piece once generated $35M in attributable pipeline for one company).

02 · The 80% video Coming Q3 2026

The eight questions your reps answer on every first call, answered once on the page, 7 to 12 minutes. Cuts the first sales call from 60 minutes to 20. The buyer arrives pre-educated; the rep skips the "so what is this?" loop entirely.

03 · Product / Service-fit video Coming Q3 2026

The on-camera version of the disqualifier. Uses the "not for" list as the script. Counterintuitively, the strongest trust-builder on the site: a buyer who watches you say "we'd refuse this engagement" trusts the rest of the work differently than one who only reads it.

04 · Landing-page video Recording this week →

60 to 90 second founder hero, phone-shot. Replaces the static manifesto opener on the homepage. The medium has to match the message: if the methodology is "the seller on camera, before the call," the homepage has to demonstrate that in the first three seconds.

05 · Customer-journey video Coming Q3 2026

Three minutes: what working with us actually looks like, week by week. Pairs with /how-it-works. The video isn't a brochure; it's a "before you book, here's exactly what the next twelve weeks of your calendar would look like."

06 · Bio video Coming Q3 2026

Founder's story, one-take walk-and-talk. The "why this exists" version of the about page, on camera, in your own voice. The longest of the three launch videos because the personal story is the part the page can't carry.

07 · The Claims We Make Coming Q4 2026

Defending the strongest claims on camera: "the seller is back," "the $40K agency homepage," "we'd rather lose the deal than waste your quarter." Shot late, after the first cohort gives us proof to point at when we defend them.

Why the Selling 7 sit alongside the Big 5: the Big 5 pages answer the questions buyers research. The Selling 7 are the formats those answers ship in. Pages teach. Videos earn trust. You need both.

Big 5: the long-form pages

The questions buyers research before they reach out.

Three of the Big 5 are full long-form pages, each a 10 to 15-minute read. The other two (reviews & proof, best-in-class) are intentionally not on the site yet. We'll publish them once we have the engagement data to write them honestly.

01 · Cost & price Live →

The math, not the number. What drives an engagement up. What drives it down. Why we'd refuse at any price.

02 · Problems & objections ↑ Above

The eight things you're already worried about. Each one with a 60-second video and a 600-word write-up.

03 · Comparisons Live →

SLM vs. CMO, vs. agency, vs. SDR firm, vs. doing nothing. With "pick them if…" cases.

Ready to score yourself?

Ten questions. A-F grade. Free PDF report. No email gate.

Take the readiness score →